Defense Presumptions Theft Montgomery Maryland Law 7-110

Tags

, , , ,

Defense/Presumptions For Theft Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different Defense/Presumptions For Theft in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Defense/Presumptions For Theft in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Defense/Presumptions For Theft in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – CRIMES INVOLVING THEFT – DEFENSES AND PRESUMPTIONS –STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. §7-110. Defenses and presumptions

(a) Prohibited defense — Interest in property. —

(1) It is not a defense to the crime of theft that the defendant has an interest in the property that was the subject of the theft if another also has an interest in or right to possess the property that the defendant is not entitled to infringe.

(2) In determining the right of possession:

(i) a joint or common owner of the property does not have a right of possession of the property that is superior to the right of any other joint or common owner of the property; and

(ii) in the absence of a contrary agreement, a person in lawful possession of the property has a right of possession superior to the right of possession of a person who has only a security interest in the property, even if legal title to the property lies with the holder of the security interest under a conditional sale contract or other security agreement.

(b) Prohibited defense — Illegally obtained property. —

(1) It is not a defense to the crime of theft that the property was taken, obtained, or withheld from a person who had obtained the property by illegal means.

(2) It is not a defense to the crime of theft of property or services with a value of less than $ 100 as provided under § 7-104(g)(3) of this subtitle that the value of the property or services at issue is $ 100 or more.

(c) Allowed defenses. — It is a defense to the crime of theft that:

(1) the defendant acted under a good faith claim of right to the property involved;

(2) the defendant acted in the honest belief that the defendant had the right to obtain or exert control over the property as the defendant did;

(3) the property involved was that of the defendant’s spouse, unless the defendant and the defendant’s spouse were not living together as husband and wife and were living in separate residences at the time of the alleged theft; or

(4) in a case of theft of a trade secret, the defendant rightfully knew the trade secret, or the trade secret was available to the defendant from a source other than the owner.

(d) Common law and evidentiary presumptions. — Any common law and evidentiary presumption applicable on July 1, 1979 to the crimes consolidated under this part also apply to the crime of theft, unless the presumption:

(1) is repealed or modified under this part; or

(2) is modified by a court decision rendered after July 1, 1979.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – CRIMES INVOLVING THEFT – DEFENSES AND PRESUMPTIONS

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. §7-110

Description

§7-110 (a) Prohibited defense: Interest in property It is not a defense to the crime of theft that the defendant has an interest in the property that was the subject of the theft if another also has an interest in or right to possess the property that the defendant is not entitled to infringe
(2) In determining the right of possession (i) a joint or common owner of the property does not have a right of possession of the property that is superior to the right of any other joint or common owner of the property; and

(ii) in the absence of a contrary agreement, a person in lawful possession of the property has a right of possession superior to the right of possession of a person who has only a security interest in the property, even if legal title to the property lies with the holder of the security interest under a conditional sale contract or other security agreement.

§7-110 (b) Illegally obtained property (1) It is not a defense to the crime of theft that the property was taken, obtained, or withheld from a person who had obtained the property by illegal means.

(2) It is not a defense to the crime of theft of property or services with a value of less than $ 100 as provided under § 7-104(g)

(3) of this subtitle that the value of the property or services at issue is $ 100 or more.

§7-110 (c) Allowed defenses. It is a defense to the crime of theft that:

(1) the defendant acted under a good faith claim of right to the property involved;

(2) the defendant acted in the honest belief that the defendant had the right to obtain or exert control over the property as the defendant did;

(3) the property involved was that of the defendant’s spouse, unless the defendant and the defendant’s spouse were not living together as husband and wife and were living in separate residences at the time of the alleged theft; or

(4) in a case of theft of a trade secret, the defendant rightfully knew the trade secret, or the trade secret was available to the defendant from a source other than the owner.

§7-110 (d) Common law and evidentiary presumptions. Any common law and evidentiary presumption applicable on July 1, 1979 to the crimes consolidated under this part also apply to the crime of theft, unless the presumption:

(1) is repealed or modified under this part; or

(2) is modified by a court decision rendered after July 1, 1979.

Defense/Presumptions For Theft in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

Bad Checks Theft Montgomery Maryland Lawyer 7-107

Tags

, , , , ,

Obtaining Property/Service By Bad Check – Prosecuted As Theft Defense – Montgomery Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Obtaining Property/Service By Bad Check – Prosecuted As Theft in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Obtaining Property/Service By Bad Check – Prosecuted As Theft in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Obtaining Property/Service By Bad Check – Prosecuted As Theft in Montgomery Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – BAD CHECKS-STATUTES; PROSECUTION AS THEFT – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 7-107. Bad checks — Prosecution as theft

(a) Scope of section. — A person who obtains property or a service by a bad check under the circumstances described in Title 8, Subtitle 1 of this article may not be prosecuted for theft under this part unless that person:

(1) makes a false representation that there are sufficient funds in the drawee bank to cover the check; and

(2) commits deception as provided under § 7-104(b) or (e) of this part.

(b) Presumptions. — If a person is prosecuted for theft under this section, the presumptions of § 8-104 of this article apply to the same extent as if the person were prosecuted under § 7-104 of this part.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – CRIMES INVOLVING THEFT – BAD CHECKS; PROSECUTION AS THEFT:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 7-107

Description

§ 7-107 (a)Bad checks – Prosecution as theft A person who obtains property or a service by a bad check under the circumstances described in Title 8, Subtitle 1 of this article may not be prosecuted for theft under this part unless that person:(1) makes a false representation that there are sufficient funds in the drawee bank to cover the check; and(2) commits deception as provided under § 7-104(b) or (e) of this part
§ 7-107 (b)Presumptions The presumptions of § 8-104 of this article apply to the same extent as if the person were prosecuted under § 7-104 of this part.
Obtaining Property/Service By Bad Check – Prosecuted As Theft in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Embezzlement Montgomery Maryland Law 7-113

Tags

, , ,

Embezzlement Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Embezzlement in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Embezzlement in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Embezzlement in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – CRIMES INVOLVING THEFT – EMBEZZLEMENT – FRAUDULENT MISAPPROPRIATION BY FIDUCIARY – STATUTE:

§ 7-113. Embezzlement — Fraudulent misappropriation by fiduciary

(a) Prohibited. — A fiduciary may not:

(1) fraudulently and willfully appropriate money or a thing of value that the fiduciary holds in a fiduciary capacity contrary to the requirements of the fiduciary’s trust responsibility; or

(2) secrete money or a thing of value that the fiduciary holds in a fiduciary capacity with a fraudulent intent to use the money or thing of value contrary to the requirements of the fiduciary’s trust responsibility.

(b) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of the misdemeanor of embezzlement and on conviction is subject to imprisonment for not less than 1 year and not exceeding 5 years.

(c) Statute of limitations and in banc review. — A person who violates this section is subject to § 5-106(b) of the Courts Article.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS – CRIMES INVOLVING THEFT – EMBEZZLEMENT -FRAUDULENT MISAPPROPRIATION BY FIDUCIARY

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 7-113 Description Penalties
§ 7-113 Embezzlement : Fraudulent misappropriation by fiduciary A fiduciary may not:

(1) fraudulently and willfully appropriate money or a thing of value that the fiduciary holds in a fiduciary capacity contrary to the requirements of the fiduciary’s trust responsibility; or

(2) secrete money or a thing of value that the fiduciary holds in a fiduciary capacity with a fraudulent intent to use the money or thing of value contrary to the requirements of the fiduciary’s trust responsibility

Guilty of the misdemeanor of embezzlement and on conviction is subject to imprisonment for 1 to 5 years
§ 7-113 (c) Statute of limitations and in banc review A person who violates this section is subject to § 5-106(b) of the Courts Article.
Embezzlement in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

Malicious Destruction Throwing Object Vehicle Montgomery Maryland Law 6-302

Tags

, , , , ,

Malicious Destruction/Throwing Object At Vehicle Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Malicious Destruction/Throwing Object At Vehicle in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Malicious Destruction/Throwing Object At Vehicle in MontgomeryMaryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Malicious Destruction/Throwing Object At Vehicle in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS MALICIOUS DESTRUCTION THROWING OBJECT AT VEHICLE – STATUTE:

Md. CRIMINAL LAW Code Ann. § 6-302

§ 6-302. Malicious destruction — Throwing object at vehicle

(a) Prohibited. — A person may not willfully throw, shoot, or propel a rock, brick, piece of iron, steel, or other similar metal, or a dangerous missile at or into a vehicle or other means of transportation that is occupied by an individual.

(b) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS MALICIOUS DESTRUCTION THROWING OBJECT AT VEHICLE:

Maryland Statute Condition

Penalties

Md. CRIMINAL LAW Code Ann. § 6-302Malicious destruction A person who willfully threw, shoots, or propels a rock, brick, piece of iron, steel, or other similar metal, or a dangerous missile at or into a vehicle or other means of transportation that is occupied by an individual Shall be guilty of a misdemeanor and be subject to imprisonment up to 1 year or a fine up to $ 500 or both
Malicious Destruction/Throwing Object At Vehicle in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Trespass Posted Property Montgomery Maryland Lawyer 6-402

Tags

, , , ,

Trespass On Posted Property Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Trespass On Posted Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Trespass On Posted Property in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Trespass On Posted Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS ON POSTED PROPERTY – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-402. Trespass on posted property

(a) Prohibited. — A person may not enter or trespass on property that is posted conspicuously against trespass by:

(1) signs placed where they reasonably may be seen; or

(2) paint marks that:

(i) conform with regulations that the Department of Natural Resources adopts under § 5-209 of the Natural Resources Article; and

(ii) are made on trees or posts that are located:

1. at each road entrance to the property; and

2. adjacent to public roadways, public waterways, and other land adjoining the property.

(b) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to:

(1) for a first violation, imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both;

(2) for a second violation occurring within 2 years after the first violation, imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or both; and

(3) for each subsequent violation occurring within 2 years after the preceding violation, imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $ 2,500 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS ON POSTED PROPERTY:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-402

Description

Penalties

Trespass on posted property A person may not enter or trespass on property that is posted conspicuously against trespass by:

(1) signs placed where they reasonably may be seen; or

(2) paint marks that:

(i) conform with regulations that the Department of Natural Resources adopts under § 5-209 of the Natural Resources Article; and

(ii) are made on trees or posts that are located at each road entrance to the property; and adjacent to public roadways, public waterways, and other land adjoining the property

First Violation Imprisonment up to 90 days or a fine up to $ 500 or both;
Second violation occurring within 2 years Imprisonment up to 6 months or a fine up to $ 1,000 or both
For each subsequent violation occurring within 2 years after the first violation Imprisonment up to 1 year or a fine up to $ 2,500 or both
Trespass On Posted Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Use Vehicle Private Property Montgomery Maryland Lawyer 6-404

Tags

, , , ,

Use Of A Vehicle On Private Property Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Use Of A Vehicle On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Use Of A Vehicle On Private Property in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Use Of A Vehicle On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – USE OF A VEHICLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-404. Use of a vehicle on private property

(a) Scope of section. — This section does not apply to:

(1) a vessel;

(2) a military, fire, or law enforcement vehicle;

(3) a farm-type tractor, other agricultural equipment used for agricultural purposes, or construction equipment used for agricultural purposes or earth moving;

(4) earth-moving or construction equipment used for those purposes; or

(5) a lawn mower, snowblower, garden or lawn tractor, or golf cart while being used for its designed purpose.

(b) Prohibited. — Except when traveling on a clearly designated private driveway, a person may not use a vehicle or off-road vehicle on private property unless the person has in the person’s possession the written permission of the owner or tenant of the private property.

(c) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – USE OF A VEHICLE ON PRIVATE PROPERTY:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-404

Description

Penalties

§ 6-404 (b & (c))Use of a vehicle on private property Except when traveling on a clearly designated private driveway, a person may not use a vehicle or off-road vehicle on private property unless the person has in the person’s possession the written permission of the owner or tenant of the private property Guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both
§ 6-404 (a) Scope of section This section does not apply to:

(1) a vessel;

(2) a military, fire, or law enforcement vehicle;

(3) a farm-type tractor, other agricultural equipment used for agricultural purposes, or construction equipment used for agricultural purposes or earth moving;

(4) earth-moving or construction equipment used for those purposes; or

(5) a lawn mower, snow-blower, garden or lawn tractor, or golf cart while being used for its designed purpose

Use Of A Vehicle On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Wanton Trespass Private Property Montgomery Maryland Law 6-403

Tags

, , , ,

Wanton Trespass On Private Property Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Wanton Trespass On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Wanton Trespass On Private Property in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Wanton Trespass On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS WANTON TRESPASS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-403. Wanton trespass on private property

(a) Prohibited — Entering and crossing property. — A person may not enter or cross over private property or board the boat or other marine vessel of another, after having been notified by the owner or the owner’s agent not to do so, unless entering or crossing under a good faith claim of right or ownership.

(b) Prohibited — Remaining on property. — A person may not remain on private property including the boat or other marine vessel of another, after having been notified by the owner or the owner’s agent not to do so.

(c) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to:

(1) for a first violation, imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both;

(2) for a second violation occurring within 2 years after the first violation, imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or both; and

(3) for each subsequent violation occurring within 2 years after the preceding violation, imprisonment not exceeding 1 year or a fine not exceeding $ 2,500 or both.

(d) Construction of section. — This section prohibits only wanton entry on private property.

(e) Applicability to housing projects. — This section also applies to property that is used as a housing project and operated by a housing authority or State public body, as those terms are defined in Division II of the Housing and Community Development Article, if an authorized agent of the housing authority or State public body gives the required notice specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this section.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS WANTON TRESPASS ON PRIVATE PROPERTY:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-403 Wanton trespass on private property

Description

Penalties

§ 6-403 (a)Entering and crossing property A person may not enter or cross over private property or board the boat or other marine vessel of another, after having been notified by the owner or the owner’s agent not to do so, unless entering or crossing under a good faith claim of right or ownership Guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to
For a first violation Imprisonment up to 90 days or a fine up to $ 500 or both;
For a second violation occurring within 2 years after the first violation Imprisonment up to 6 months or a fine up to $ 1,000 or both
§ 6-403 (b)Remaining on property A person may not remain on private property including the boat or other marine vessel of another, after having been notified by the owner or the owner’s agent not to do so.
For each subsequent violation occurring within 2 years Imprisonment up to 1 year or a fine up to $ 2,500 or both
§ 6-403 (d) This section prohibits only wanton entry on private property
§ 6-403 (e)Applicability to housing projects This section also applies to property that is used as a housing project and operated by a housing authority or State public body, as those terms are defined in Division II of the Housing and Community Development Article, if an authorized agent of the housing authority or State public body gives the required notice specified in subsection (a) or (b) of this section.
Wanton Trespass On Private Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Use Off-Road Vehicle Public Property Montgomery Maryland Law 6-405

Tags

, , , ,

Use Of A Off-Road Vehicle On Public Property Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Use Of A Off-Road Vehicle On Public Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Use Of A Off-Road Vehicle On Public Property in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Use Of A Off-Road Vehicle On Public Property in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – USE OF AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-405. Use of an off-road vehicle on public property

(a) “Political subdivision” defined. — In this section, “political subdivision” includes a:

(1) county;

(2) municipal corporation;

(3) bi-county or multicounty agency;

(4) county board of education;

(5) public authority; or

(6) special taxing district.

(b) Scope of section. — This section does not apply to:

(1) a vessel;

(2) a military, fire, or law enforcement vehicle;

(3) a farm-type tractor, other agricultural equipment used for agricultural purposes, or construction equipment used for agricultural purposes or earth moving;

(4) earth-moving or construction equipment used for those purposes; or

(5) a lawn mower, snow-blower, garden or lawn tractor, or golf cart while being used for its designed purpose.

(c) Prohibited. — Except as otherwise allowed by law, a person may not use an off-road vehicle on property known by the person to be owned or leased by the State or a political subdivision.

(d) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – USE OF AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE ON PUBLIC PROPERTY:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-405

Description

Penalties

§ 6-405 (c) & (d) Use of an off-road vehicle on public property Except as otherwise allowed by law, a person may not use an off-road vehicle on property known by the person to be owned or leased by the State or a political subdivision Guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both
§ 6-405 (a) “Political subdivision” includes: (1) county;

(2) municipal corporation;

(3) bi-county or multicounty agency;

(4) county board of education;

(5) public authority; or

(6) special taxing district

§ 6-405 (b) – Scope of section This section does not apply to

(1) a vessel;

(2) a military, fire, or law enforcement vehicle;

(3) a farm-type tractor, other agricultural equipment used for agricultural purposes, or construction equipment used for agricultural purposes or earth moving;

(4) earth-moving or construction equipment used for those purposes; or

(5) a lawn mower, snow-blower, garden or lawn tractor, or golf cart while being used for its designed purpose

Use Of A Off-Road Vehicle On Public Property in Montgomery Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Entry Property Invading Privacy Montgomery Maryland Law 6-408

Tags

, , , ,

Entry On Property For Purpose Of Invading Privacy Of Occupants Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Entry On Property For Purpose Of Invading Privacy Of Occupants in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Entry On Property For Purpose Of Invading Privacy Of Occupants in Montgomery Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Entry On Property For Purpose Of Invading Privacy Of Occupants in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – ENTRY ON PROPERTY FOR PURPOSE OF INVADING PRIVACY OF OCCUPANTS – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-408. Entry on property for purpose of invading privacy of occupants

(a) Prohibited. — A person may not enter on the property of another for the purpose of invading the privacy of an occupant of a building or enclosure located on the property by looking into a window, door, or other opening.

(b) Penalty. — A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 90 days or a fine not exceeding $ 500 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – ENTRY ON PROPERTY FOR PURPOSE OF INVADING PRIVACY OF OCCUPANTS:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-408

Description

Penalties

Entry on property for purpose of invading privacy of occupants A person may not enter on the property of another for the purpose of invading the privacy of an occupant of a building or enclosure located on the property by looking into a window, door, or other opening Guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment up to 90 days or a fine up to $ 500 or both
Entry On Property For Purpose Of Invading Privacy Of Occupants in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304

//

Refusal Failure Leave Public Building Montgomery Maryland Law 6-409

Tags

, , , , ,

Refusal Or Failure To Leave Public Building Or Grounds Defense Montgomery – Maryland Lawyers

There are many different penalties for Refusal Or Failure To Leave Public Building Or Grounds in Montgomery, Maryland.

If you have been charged with Refusal Or Failure To Leave Public Building Or Grounds Montgomery in Maryland, contact our firm immediately for help.

Refusal Or Failure To Leave Public Building Or Grounds in Montgomery, Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – REFUSAL OR FAILURE TO LEAVE PUBLIC BUILDING OR GROUNDS – STATUTE:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. § 6-409.

Refusal or failure to leave public building or grounds

(a) Prohibited — During regularly closed hours. — A person may not refuse or fail to leave a public building or grounds, or a specific part of a public building or grounds, during the time when the public building or grounds, or specific part of the public building or grounds, is regularly closed to the public if:

(1) the surrounding circumstances would indicate to a reasonable person that the person who refuses or fails to leave has no apparent lawful business to pursue at the public building or grounds; and

(2) a regularly employed guard, watchman, or other authorized employee of the government unit that owns, operates, or maintains the public building or grounds asks the person to leave.

(b) Prohibited –– During regular business hours. — A person may not refuse or fail to leave a public building or grounds, or a specific part of a public building or grounds, during regular business hours if:

(1) the surrounding circumstances would indicate to a reasonable person that the person who refuses or fails to leave:

(i) has no apparent lawful business to pursue at the public building or grounds; or

(ii) is acting in a manner disruptive of and disturbing to the conduct of normal business by the government unit that owns, operates, or maintains the public building or grounds; and

(2) an authorized employee of the government unit asks the person to leave.

(c) Penalty. –– A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or both.

MONTGOMERY MARYLAND LAWYERS TRESPASS – REFUSAL OR FAILURE TO LEAVE PUBLIC BUILDING OR GROUNDS:

Md. Criminal Law Code Ann. §6- 409

Description

Penalties

Refusal or failure to leave public building or grounds A person may not refuse or fail to leave a public building or grounds, or a specific part of a public building or grounds, during the time when the public building or grounds, or specific part of the public building or grounds, is regularly closed to the public if:

(1) the surrounding circumstances would indicate to a reasonable person that the person who refuses or fails to leave has no apparent lawful business to pursue at the public building or grounds; and

(2) a regularly employed guard, watchman, or other authorized employee of the government unit that owns, operates, or maintains the public building or grounds asks the person to leave

A person who violates this section is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is subject to imprisonment not exceeding 6 months or a fine not exceeding $ 1,000 or both
A person may not refuse or fail to leave a public building or grounds, or a specific part of a public building or grounds, during regular business hours if:

(1) the surrounding circumstances would indicate to a reasonable person that the person who refuses or fails to leave:

(i) has no apparent lawful business to pursue at the public building or grounds; or

(ii) is acting in a manner disruptive of and disturbing to the conduct of normal business by the government unit that owns, operates, or maintains the public building or grounds; and

(2) an authorized employee of the government unit asks the person to leave

Refusal Or Failure To Leave Public Building Or Grounds in Maryland.

We will do our absolute best to help you get the best result possible based on the facts of your case.

Article written by A SrisA Sris
Sris Law Group
1-240-399-0304